[ WS102 Syllabus | Course Plan | Assignments | StudentWriting
WSTimelines | Women'sHistoryMonth |
| WS 101 Links | WS 102 Links-HumanitiesTopics | WS102Women's Arts | WSFilms]
Assignments: Online Handouts
|Participation Credits ("PC" for selected class activities) & informal written Dialogues (individual and small group responses to major course presentations & readings). Some may be made up or turned in late with no penalty by arrangement with instructor, and a limited number of extra credit options will be offered.|
|Midterm Discussion Paper (4-to-5 typed/wordprocessed, double-spaced critical/analytical paper on a focused topic drawn from course presentations & readings in the first half of the term). Revision Option for papers turned in on time; Late papers accepted with a one grade penalty.|
|Critical Review (of 3-to-5 outside sources on a topic of personal interest relevant to the course, including preliminary topic description & source list, small group oral report, and 4 extra copies or electronic version for webpublishing on WS 102 website). In-Class Oral Report cannot be made up or given late; Written Critical Review will be accepted late with a one grade penalty but no later than the Final Exam meeting.|
|Final Course Reflections & Self-Evaluation (may be prepared in advance or written during scheduled Final Exam meeting): Final will not be accepted later than the scheduled Final Exam date.|
See also Statement on Plagiarism in WS 102 Syllabus
Midterm Discussion Paper
Directions, Topics, & Evaluation Criteria
And see StudentWriting
[Running Page Header]
[Standard MLA-style Heading:]
Janet Student [your name]
WS 102, Prof. Agatucci [identify course & instructor]
Midterm Discussion Paper [identify assignment]
16 February 1999 [give date due]
Midterm Discussion Paper:
Directions, Topics, and Evaluation Criteria
[Center the Title of your Midterm Discussion Paper]
1. Suggested Length: 4-5 typed/wordprocessed and double-spaced pages; or 6-8 legibly handwritten, single-spaced pages. Please type or write on only one side of a standard-sized (8 ½" X 11") white paper. Leave one inch margins at the top, bottom and sides of each page. Use the heading above placed in the upper left-hand corner of the first page of your discussion paper. Type or write your last name and the page number in the upper right-hand corner of the second and each subsequent page of your discussion paper.
2. Grading: Midterm Discussion Paper is worth 30% of your course grade. Review Late policy and Revision Option described in the WS 102 syllabus.
3. Topics: Choose one of the following topics as the subject of your Discussion Paper:
TOPIC #1: After five weeks in WS 102, how would you now define Studies in Women and Gender in the Humanities? Write your Midterm Discussion Paper in response to this question.
a. Limit yourself to two to four defining features of such studies, grounded in your experience of Weeks #1-5 course presentations, reading materials, and learning activities--approached as practical demonstrations of the kinds of knowledge, goals, and perspectives that such studies offer regarding women, gender, and humankind.
b. Be sure to define any special terminology (e.g., "gender" or "feminist") that you introduce in your discussion paper. When you quote or paraphrase from WS 102 readings, be sure to identify the source and page number in parenthesis after the citation, like this: (Packet 93). If you intend to cite other outside sources, you will have to give fuller information to avoid plagiarism: see Cora for advice.)
c. Explain and illustrate each your defining points with well-selected specific examples drawn from WS 102 course resources, dialogues, and learning experiences thus far. A minimum requirement is that your paper integrate discussion and/or examples from at least two of the following:
- One assigned reading from WS 102 course packet (to date)
- One presentation by Instructor or Guest (and related readings if applicable)
- Toni Morrisons Beloved
d. In concluding your discussion paper, speculate on the value and/or limitations of studies in women and gender, as you currently understand it, and explain your evaluation.
TOPIC #2: You are invited to propose in advance an alternative topic of special interest to you for the Midterm Discussion Paper. However, your topic proposal should be relevant to the womens and gender studies in the humanities and allow you to meet the minimum requirement for discussion of course resources described under part c above.
Alternative Topic proposals should be written out and discussed with Cora no later than Tuesday, Feb. 9, 1999.
4. Evaluation Criteria: The grade and points your Discussion Paper earns will primarily be determined by the following evaluation criteria:
(1) good faith effort to follow directions and to address all parts of the selected topic;
(2) evidence of thoughtful response to and serious engagement with the question addressed in the discussion paper, using this assignment to stimulate a meaningful learning experience;
(3) evidence of thorough acquaintance with, understanding of, and ability to apply course concepts and ideas, drawn from class presentations, readings, and/or discussion, as relevant to the topic;
(4) ability to offer insightful analysis, comparisons and/or synthesis of selected course materials in addressing the topic;
(5) ability to support, explain, clarify and illustrate your opinions clearly and convincingly with clear explanation, sound reasoning, and relevant, well-selected specific examples/evidence; and
(6) ability to express your ideas clearly, coherently, and effectively so that a diverse WS 102 readership, coming from many different perspectives and levels of awareness, could follow and understand your points. (Note that errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, and mechanics will not normally damage your grade unless they interfere with the clarity and sense of your communication.)
Critical Review: Four Parts
Erin R. Yourlastname
WS 102, Prof. Agatucci
11 March 1999
Critical Review: Your Chosen Topic
The Critical Review is worth 30% of your course grade, as stated in the WS 102 Syllabus. Please review the Late Policy stated in the WS 102 Syllabus for this assignment. There are four parts to this assignment, worth a total of 100 points possible. NOTE WELL: The oral report cannot given late or made up. The formal written Critical Review will be accepted late with a one grade penalty, but no later than our scheduled final exam meeting. Note also that there will be no revision option with this four-part assignment. Please ask questions and seek help when and if you need it.
DEADLINES: (see also WS 102 Revised Course Plan)
Tues., 2/23: Part I: Topic Description and Source List (5 points)
Thurs., 3/4: Part II: In-Class Oral Reports, with written Outline for Cora (15 points)
Thurs., 3/11: Part III: Critical Review (75 points) and Part IV: "Share the Riches" (5 points) - either 4 additional hardcopies of the final draft of the Critical Review to exchange with other WS 102 students, or an electronic version for webposting to the WS 102 website)
Topic: You will find 3-5 good sources to review on an research topic or question of personal interest to you, and relevant to the content and learning goals of WS 102. It may be helpful to review course syllabus and course plan, WS 102 website, your course notes and Dialogues, and/or the Midterm Discussion Paper to identify possible topics and research questions for this research assignment.
Selection of Outside Sources for the Critical Review:
The Four Required Parts of the Critical Review
Part I: TOPIC DESCRIPTION & SOURCE LIST (5 points)
This is an informal part of the Critical Review assignment, to be evaluated on the basis of demonstrating that you are making satisfactory progress toward completing the Critical Review: i.e., your topic has been selected, you have begun research and have located at least 3 good sources, and you are trying to follow MLA style for documenting your source citations. For this assignment,
Cora will offer MLA format corrections and suggestions at this preliminary stage and return the preliminary list to you to help you format correctly your sources in the formal written Critical Review.
Part II: ORAL REPORT (15 points)
You will be asked to make a 5-to-7 minute oral presentation to a small group of other WS 102 students in class on the date scheduled in the Revised Course Plan.
Your Oral Report should be a 5-to-7 minute presentation on your Critical Review research which you make to a small group of WS 102 students. Come to class on the day scheduled prepared to:
Audience Response (for PCs): Afterward your report, there should be class time for questions and comments on your report. Then group members will be asked to complete an Audience Response form (which Cora will provide) to comment on how well prepared your presentation seemed to be given the time limit, and what your group members learned from your report to extend beyond available WS 102 course content and learning resources. Audience comments and your written outline will assist Cora in evaluating your oral presentation.
Part III: [THE FORMAL WRITTEN] CRITICAL REVIEW (75 points)
Heading, Running Page Headers, & Length: Use the standard MLA heading modeled on the first page of this direction handoutno Title Page is needed, nor is it recommended. Each subsequent page of your Critical Review should be properly labeled with the standard MLA Running Page Headeryour last name and the page number in the upper righthand corneras modeled in this direction handout. The Final draft of the formal written Critical Review must be typed or wordprocessed and double spaced on standard-sized white paper, with 1" margins on all sides, etc. As for length, your Critical Review should be as long as it needs to be to get the job done well, following directions in this handout and discussed in class. I anticipate that a good complete Critical Review can be accomplished in 4 typed, double-spaced pages.
Introduce the topic or research question(s) that you are using the Critical Review to research. Clearly present the leading research question(s), problem, and/or issue that you set out to answer, resolve, explore through this research project. Explain why you have chosen this topic or question, and why/how you became interested in investigating it further through this research assignment. Explain how the topic is relevant to WS 102 and how it offers a valuable extension beyond regular course content and materialsfor you as well as for others.
Critical Review of Sources
This section of your Critical Review will present a review of three-to-five good sources that you have located and consulted on your selected topic. Sources should be reviewed in the form of an annotated bibliography, cited in correct MLA style and listed alphabetically, and each source citation should be "annotated" with (a) a concise descriptive summary of the contents, giving readers a clear idea of what the source has to offer, and emphasizing what the source has to contribute on your topic; and (b) a brief critique or evaluation of the sources major strength(s), as well as any weakness(es). Two samples are given below of the content summary and evaluation of sources, using annotated bibliography format.
Two samples are given here of the content summary and evaluation of sources, using annotated bibliography format:
Schmidt, J. Howard, and John S. Hashimoto. "Polls and Public Opinion." New York Times 22 Mar. 1994,
late ed.: B2. Schmidt and Hashimoto tested the hypothesis that poll results on socio-political issues shape public opinion.
This study is particularly relevant to one of my leading research questions: just how much power does the U.S. media have to
influence public opinion on political issues? Schmidt and Hashimoto conducted surveys and interviews of one hundred college
students, half male, half female, and the study revealed that subjects were most likely to be influenced by opinion polls if they
did not know much about the issues and/or they had no strong pre-existing personal views on the issues. Given the small
sampling limited to college students, this study is hardly conclusive, nor representative of the American public at large. Yet
Schmidt and Hashimotos study suggests that some segments of the population may be immune to media influence,
particularly if they have taken the time to study the issues and form their own conclusions.
Thompson, Stith. The Folktale. New York: Dryden, 1986. Thompson, folklorist and linguist, offers a useful
survey of forty-six popular folktales used in Euro-American literary works. He traces the histories of predominantly European
folktales from their oral cultural roots to their literary transformations, and examines their literary functions with some
illuminating results. I found interesting cross-cultural correlations to the ways African oral folktales are used in modern African
literature and fiction: for example, multiple and changing versions of an oral tale give Western fiction writers freedom to select
and adapt a folktale to make it serve new literary uses and messages. Still, it is clear that oral arts traditions do not carry the
same social and spiritual weight in European works as they do in African arts and literatures. Thompsons sometimes dense
and jargon-ridden prose style may frustrate non-specialist audiences, but the persistent reader interested in the oral roots of
world literatures will find many rewards in this knowledgeable, well-researched, and thoroughly indexed reference book.
Explain, in summary, what you have gained from your research, and what others might gain from following your lead. Emphasize the most valuable finding(s) that you have learned from your outside sources, and how your research on the chosen topic or question has contributed to a better understanding of WS 102 course content, issues, texts, methods, and/or goals. You may also wish to identify further questions or topics raised by your research that you would like (someday) to investigate further.
Part IV: SHARING THE RICHES!! (5 points)
You will be asked to make your formal written Critical Review available to other interested students in one of these two forms. Either . . .
1. you can duplicate four (4) additional hardcopies of your formal written Critical Review (besides the one youve prepared for Cora) to distribute to other WS 102 students in class on the date the Critical Review is due. NO Late hardcopies can be accepted, since the Critical Review is due on the last class meeting of the term.
OR . . .
2. you may present an electronic version of your Critical Review (in addition to the hardcopy submitted to Cora for grading) for posting to Coras WS 102 website. Cora will discuss this option further in class. You may elect to have your Critical Review posted anonymously (unsigned without your name published) if you prefer.
WS 102 SyllabusWS
102 Course PlanWS
WS 102 Links - Humanities TopicsWS 102 Women's Arts
More Women's & Gender Studies LinksWomen's History Month
Cora's Home page