Research Proposal Evaluation NAME____________________________
WR 123,
Spring 2010, Prof. C. Agatucci
___Grade penalty if submitted late & NO revision option.
GRADE ________
___Formal Graded Assignment must be word-processed,
double-spaced, and submitted in both
paper (hard) copy and translatable electronic form, or it will NOT be
accepted for grading.
___(MS) Final Draft meets required specifications and Plagiarism is avoided:
Sources summarized, paraphrased,
& quoted are cited in PARTS 1, 2, 3; & full bibliographical information is
given in Part 4.
Electronic version has been submitted to Turnitin to test for verbatim plagiarism:
see WR
123 Syllabus.
PART 1. Research Topic Introduction,
Rationale, & Documentation System
___1.A. Introduction to focused topic is clear;
key terms are defined & sufficient background is provided for general, non-specialist
WR 123 audience; In-Text
Citations are provided for sources summarized,
paraphrased, &/or quoted in Part 1 (and complete bibliographical entries for all
sources cited here, are given in Part 4)
___1.B. Rationale: Student’s reasons for choosing topic (e.g. personal
experience, connections, other source/s of special interest) are elaborated
& persuasive in promising that student can sustain interest/commitment to
research project & bring it to successful completion in one quarter. Topic’s
(potential) value to student researcher & others is projected. Practical reasons for
topic choice (e.g. number of sources available, serves research project for another class, willingness to conduct open-minded
inquiry, etc.) also stated.
___1.C. Documentation system is identified, with brief accompanying
statement that it was pre-approved as appropriate for student's topic choice
by Cora (& if doubling with another course, by the other instructor).
___In-Text Citations are
provided for any sources summarized, paraphrased, &/or quoted in Part 1 (and
complete bibliographical entries for any
sources cited here are given in Part 4)
PART 2. Leading Research Question & Working
Hypothesis predict a clear, enabling focus and well-defined point of
departure for this proposed research project, and NOTE WELL: there must be
a clear question-answer correlation between 2.A. and 2.B!
___2.A. Leading research question is clearly
stated, and provides a central focus & clear point of departure for the
research project.
___2.B. Working hypothesis/Tentative thesis) provides preliminary answer to the leading research
question is clearly stated, seems well-informed & specific enough to
suggest student has conducted diligent exploratory research, preliminary reading & thinking in preparing this proposal.
___In-Text Citations are
provided for any sources summarized, paraphrased, &/or quoted in Part 2 (and
complete bibliographical entries for any
sources cited here are given in Part 4)
PART 3. Research Plan
section is complete,
shows strong evidence of serious, diligent exploratory research & preliminary
thinking/reading on the research topic; and offers persuasive accounts &
examples of college-level informational research skills, developed
specifically enough to direct future research in promising ways.
___3.A. Supporting Research Questions
& Preliminary Answers. Organized list of supporting
research questions & preliminary answers: (using complete well-formed
questions/sentences)
-Are thoughtful, well-informed, and relevant to
Parts 1 & 2;
-Include key terms & concepts, and at least some preliminary answers to above
questions are integrated;
-List of questions & preliminary answers is
logically organized (e.g. related groupings set off by labeled subheadings, outline format, white space,
etc.)
___In-Text
Citations are provided for sources summarized,
paraphrased, &/or quoted in Part 3 (and complete bibliographical entries for all
sources cited here, are given in Part 4)
___3.B. Search Strategies that student has
already used and plans to use in future to find valuable sources, suggest
diligent exploratory research , class preparation, and competent college-level
(LIB 127) informational research skills; and promise to yield a solid research
base for the Critical Research Paper.
-Brief
but clear explanation of Search Strategies used to find each of 7+ sources (documented in Part
4) is provided - i.e. means (search
strategies) used to obtain ends (sources) are explained
-Search terms & boolean commands used are
identified, distinguishing those most valuable so far;
-Any additional search strategies already tried
but that did not yield useful sources, are identified;
-Future plans--e.g. search strategies,
informational resources, search terms, other leads, etc.--are described, and promise to yield a
solid research base for Critical Research Paper
-Understanding of differences among "primary"
and "secondary" and "teritiary" sources is demonstrated
with brief definitions and specific examples.
PART 4. Working Annotated Bibliography Required Minimum
= seven (7) relevant sources already
located and consulted. For each source:
___Complete bibliographical information is given,
showing good faith attempt to follow pre-approved documentation system format.
___Annotations (using complete
sentences) identify type & length of source, search strategy used to find
source, & briefly
summarize source contents.
___WRITTEN PRESENTATION is Clear,
Coherent, & Grammatically Correct.
|