English 104 - Cora Agatucci
Introduction to Literature: Fiction

Response Writings ~ Fall 2001 
Webtip:  When you re-visit this webpage on your internet browser (Netscape or Explorer),
please click "Refresh" or "Reload" to ensure you are seeing the latest version of this webpage.

SHORT CUTS: Response Writing #1 Topics (Poe, Maupassant, Chekhov) & Evaluation;
Response Writing #2 Topics (Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, Garcia Marquez) & Evaluation;
Response #3
(Notes + Class Contribution - Carver, T. O'Brien, Erdrich)

See also Fall 2001 ENG 104 Course Plan
for hyperlinked week-by-week Assignments & Deadlines.

Response Writing #1 Topic Choices
(Poe, Maupassant, and/or Chekhov) - worth 5 points possible

Worth 5 points possible: Your Response Writings will be evaluated in terms of how well they demonstrate achievement of targeted English 104 course competencies relevant to your Topic Choices.  You must also address one of the assigned topic choices given below.
Directions:
  You will have at least 15 minutes in class to write Response Writing #1.  This writing  is "Open Book/Open Notes"--not a memory test--so use any course materials and notes that will help you.  Be sure to support and illustrate your points with well-selected specific passages from the literary work(s) under discussion.  Follow your quotations and/or paraphrases with brief parenthetical citations: that is, name the author and page number in parenthesis like this (Chekhov 164).

Choose one of the following topics for Response Writing #1:

Topic 1.  Poe's and Maupassant's Aesthetics:  In stating their theories of how well-crafted short stories should be written, Poe and Maupassant agree on at least one point:  that a writer must make every word count to create the story's "single effect" (Poe 855), that a writer must select "only details useful to his subject" and theme (Maupassant 832).
    a.  Choose and cite two seemingly minor details--one from "The Cask of Amontillado" and one from "The Necklace"--that seem to you particularly well selected to contribute to the dominant effect or an important theme of these stories. 
    b.  Then justify your choices: explain why you think these details are well-selected, identifying the "effect" or theme of each story to which the selected detail contributes.

[Topic 1 Evaluation: Targeted ENG 104 Course Competencies A. 1 & 2; B. 4; C. 7 & 8]

Topic 2.  Characteristics of Literary Realism: Both Maupassant and Chekhov are considered Realist writers very influential in shaping the genre of the modern short story.  
    a.  Identify and briefly explain two characteristics of literary Realism that you find applicable to "The Necklace" and/or "The Lady with the Pet Dog."
   
b.  Then illustrate these two characteristics with specific examples from either "The Necklace" or "The Lady with the Pet Dog" or both.  Be sure to cite your examples (as directed above), and explain how/why they illustrate the Realistic characteristics you have identified.

[Topic 2 Evaluation: Targeted ENG 104 Course Competencies  A. 1 & 2; B. 4; C. 7 & 8]

Topic 3.  Character: Dynamic or Static. For this topic, choose a character from either "The Cask of Amontillado," or "The Necklace," or "The Lady with the Pet Dog."  
    a.  State whether you believe your selected character is "static" or "dynamic"--and be sure to briefly define your understanding of what a "static" or "dynamic" character is.
    b.  Justify your classification of this character as "static" or "dynamic," by citing and analyzing well-selected examples taken from the beginning and ending of the story--that is:

bullet

Identify one or two key traits of this character presented early in the story, or when the character is introduced;

bullet

Analyzing how the plot outcome/ending of the story has (or has not) affected the identified trait(s) of the character.

[Topic 3: Targeted ENG 104 Course Competencies  A. 3; B. 4; C. 7 & 8]

Topic 4.  Plot Structure: Climax.  For this topic, choose either "The Cask of Amontillado," or "The Necklace," or "The Lady with the Pet Dog."  
    a.  Define your understanding of "climax."
    b.  Identify the moment of climax in your chosen short story: that is, quote or paraphrase--and cite--the point in the story where you believe the climax takes place.
    c.  Justify your choice:  Apply your definition of "climax" to demonstrate why you believe this moment in the plot represents the climax of the story. 

[Topic 4: Targeted ENG 104 Course Competencies A. 3; B. 4; C. 7 & 8]

Topic 5.  Theme.  For this topic, choose either "The Cask of Amontillado," or "The Necklace," or "The Lady with the Pet Dog."  
    a.  Define your understanding of "theme."
    b.  State your interpretation of a major theme of your chosen story.
    c.  Support your interpretation of theme by citing and analyzing two key passages from the story that explain why you have arrived at your interpretation.

[Topic 5: Targeted ENG 104 Course Competencies A. 3; B. 4; C. 7 & 8] 

Response Writing #1 Evaluation

Your Response Writings will be evaluated in terms of how well they demonstrate achievement of targeted English 104 course competencies relevant to your Topic Choices.  You must also address an assigned topic choice when required.

Topic #1 Evaluation: Poe's and Maupassant's Aesthetics

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____1. Situate works of fiction within their contexts (e.g. literary historical periods and influences, cultural and biographical background of authors, authorial intentions and critical reception).

____2. Explain and illustrate how works of fiction reflect . . . significant aspects of their contexts.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations and evaluations--developed both independently and collaboratively.

____8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Topic #2 Evaluation: Characteristics of Literary Realism

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____1. Situate works of fiction within their contexts (e.g. literary historical periods and influences, cultural and biographical background of authors, authorial intentions and critical reception).

____2. Explain and illustrate how works of fiction reflect . . . significant aspects of their contexts.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply varied approaches--e.g., close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations . . . --developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Topic #3 Evaluation: Character -  Dynamic or Static. 

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____3. Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations and evaluations--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Topic #4 Evaluation: Plot Structure - Climax.

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____3. Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations and evaluations--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Topic #5 Evaluation: Theme

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____3. Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations and evaluations--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Response Writing #2 Topic Choices
(Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, Garcia Marquez) - worth 5 points possible

Your Response Writings will be evaluated in terms of how well they demonstrate achievement of targeted English 104 course competencies relevant to your Topic Choices.  You must also address one of the assigned topic choices given below.
Directions:  You will have at least 15 minutes in class to write Response Writing #2.  This short analysis is "Open Book/Open Notes"--not a memory test--so use any course materials and notes that will help you.  Be sure to support and illustrate your points with well-selected specific passages from the literary work(s) under discussion.  Follow your quotations and/or paraphrases with brief parenthetical citations: i.e., name the author and page number in parenthesis like this (Chekhov 164).

Choose one of the following topics for Response Writing #2.
Please identify the topic number and short story you are addressing.

TOPIC 1.  Understanding Character and Method(s) of Characterization
Focus on a major character in one of the short stories we’ve read by Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, or Garcia Marquez.  Cite and analyze one or two specific passages from the short story that you believe reveal something significant about that main character.  Also identify the method(s) of characterization represented in your selected passage(s).

TOPIC 2:  Experiments of Modernist Literature

Ezra Pound advised other Modernist writers to “Make It New!”—and so they did.  Identify one or two experiments (in form and/or content) used one of the short stories we’ve read by Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, or Garcia Marquez. Cite and analyze specific passage(s) from the chosen short story that illustrate the experiment – and explain its impact on your interpretation of the story.

(To help you define/clarify what is new about the Modernist experiment under discussion, you may want to contrast it to a previous short story that we have studied.) 

TOPIC 3:  Literature into Film

Film and literature are different artistic media, and use different, though comparable, methods of story telling.  Each medium has unique capabilities, strengths as well as limitations, and filmmakers face many creative challenges when “translating” written fiction into film.  Imagine you are a film director and you are going to adapt one of the short stories we have read by Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, or Garcia Marquez, into film.  Identify one such creative challenge posed by the short story in question, and explain why it would be challenging to translate into film.

TOPIC 4:  Comparison/Contrast of two writers and their short stories

Identify and analyze one or two differences and/or similarities that you deem significant in two short stories we have read thus far in Eng 104.  One of the stories must be by Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka or Garcia Marquez.  Be sure to cite specific passages from the short stories to illustrate your points, and be sure to explain why the difference or similarity seems significant in understanding the writers and their literary works.

Response Writing #2 Evaluation

Your Response Writings will be evaluated in terms of how well they demonstrate achievement of targeted English 104 course competencies relevant to your Topic Choices.  You must also address an assigned topic choice when required.

Topic #1 Evaluation: Understanding Character & Method(s) of Characterization

___Required:  Addressed (all parts of) Assigned Topic Choice for one of these authors & his short story: Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, Garcia Marquez.

___Topic #1: Understanding Character & Method(s) of Characterization: a. Focus on major character; b. Cite & analyze one or two significant passages from short story to reveal character & significance; c. Identify method(s) of characterization represented in selected passage(s).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation Guide:

____ = Excellent; ____ = Very Good; ____ = Satisfactory; ____ = Weak

Response Writing #2 Evaluation & Grading for Topic #1 is based on how well your Response Writing demonstrates meets or exceeds these relevant ENG 104 course Competencies:

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____3. Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations  . . .--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Other, if applicable

Topic #2 Evaluation: Experiments in Modernist Literature

___Required:  Addressed (all parts of) Assigned Topic Choice for at least of one of these authors & his short story: Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, Garcia Marquez.

___Topic #2: Experiments in Modernist Literature: a. Identify one or two experiments in form and/or content; b. Cite & analyze specific passage(s) from short story to illustrate experiment(s); c. Explain impact of experiment(s) on your interpretation of story.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation Guide:

____ = Excellent; ____ = Very Good; ____ = Satisfactory; ____ = Weak

Response Writing #2 Evaluation & Grading for Topic #2 is based on how well your Response Writing demonstrates meets or exceeds these relevant ENG 104 course Competencies:

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____2. Explain and illustrate how works of fiction reflect and shape significant aspects of their contexts [i.e. Experimentation in Modernist literary period]

____3. [If applicable to choice of experiment(s):] Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

___5. [If applicable – i.e. if student chose to compare to earlier writer/work:] Use comparative analysis to demonstrate significant differences and similarities among works of narrative fiction (e.g., between short stories by . . . different authors . . . from different literary-historical periods).

___6. [If applicable – i.e. if student evaluates in analyzing impact of experiment] Formulate and apply persuasive criteria to the evaluation of works of fiction-- appropriate to context/genre of literary text, distinguishing between personal responses and literary-critical judgment.

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations  . . .--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Topic #3 Evaluation: Literature into Film

___Required:  Addressed (all parts of) Assigned Topic Choice for at least of one of these authors & his short story: Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, Garcia Marquez.

___Topic #3: Literature into Film: a. Approach short story as imagined film director; b. Identify one creative challenge posed by adapting short story into film; c. Explain why this aspect of the short story presents creative challenge to adapt into film.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation Guide:

____ = Excellent; ____ = Very Good; ____ = Satisfactory; ____ = Weak

Response Writing #2 Evaluation & Grading for Topic #3 is based on how well your Response Writing demonstrates meets or exceeds these relevant ENG 104 course Competencies:

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre

____1. Situate works of fiction within their contexts (e.g. authorial intentions).

____3. Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

___5. Use comparative analysis to demonstrate significant differences and similarities among works of narrative fiction (e.g., between short story and film)

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations  . . .--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Other, if applicable

Topic #4 Evaluation: Comparison/Contrast of Two Writers & Their Short Stories

___Required:  Addressed (all parts of) Assigned Topic Choice for at least of one of these authors & his short story: Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, Garcia Marquez.

___Topic #4: Comparison/Contrast of two writers & their short stories: a.  Two short stories are compared, & one of these is by Hemingway, Faulkner, Kafka, or Garcia Marquez; b. Identify & analyze one or two significant similarities and/or differences, c. citing specific passages from short stories to illustrate points, and d. explaining significance of each similarity/difference to understanding writers/literary works.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation Guide:

____ = Excellent; ____ = Very Good; ____ = Satisfactory; ____ = Weak

Response Writing #2 Evaluation & Grading for Topic #4 is based on how well your Response Writing demonstrates meets or exceeds these relevant ENG 104 course Competencies:

A. Build a Knowledge Base of a Major Literary Genre
If applicable to chosen short stories and chosen similarities and/or differences:

____1. Situate works of fiction within their contexts (e.g. literary historical periods and influences, cultural and biographical background of authors, authorial intentions and critical reception).
____2. Explain and illustrate how works of fiction reflect and shape significant aspects of their contexts.

____3. Define and explicate key literary elements of narrative fiction, such as plot, character, theme, point of view, setting, symbol, and style.

B. Develop Skills in Literary Analysis & Evaluation

___4. Apply relevant and varied approaches--e.g. close reading, contextual background information, literary concepts and approaches, multiple perspectives--to the analysis and interpretation of works of fiction.

___5. Use comparative analysis to demonstrate significant differences and similarities among works of narrative fiction (e.g., between short stories by different authors; if applicable: between works of fiction from different literary-historical periods).

C. Exercise Effective Communication Skills

___7. Use effective . . . written communication to express literary interpretations  . . .--developed both independently and collaboratively.

___8. Use well-selected evidence from the literary text(s) to support one’s literary interpretations, analyses, and evaluations.

Response #3 (Notes + Class Contribution)
Carver, T. O'Brien, Erdrich

Verbal Directions were given in class on Mon., 11/19; Due: Wed., 11/21
Response #3 is worth 5 points
(3 pts. for Notes, 2 pts. for Class Contribution).
Take thoughtful, detailed notes on both of the following topics:

1.  Comparison/Contrast (may be in list or chart form) of two authors and short stories, one of which must be Carver & "Cathedral," T. O'Brien and "The Things They Carried," or Erdrich and "The Red Convertible." 
Complete notes should include:
   
a.  Some Points of similarity and/or difference that seem significant to you;
    b.  Specific examples and/or passages (with citations)  from the stories (and any other relevant sources) that best illustrate the points of similarity and/or difference;
    c.  Explanation of the significance of each point of similarity and/or difference

2.  Evaluation of two short stories, one of which must be "Cathedral," "Things They Carried," or "The Red Convertible."  Develop relevant, critical evaluation criteria, using these sources to help you:
Evaluating Fiction (Handout) - Also recommended, courtesy of Prof. John Lye (Dept. of English, Brock Univ.):  Depth, Complexity, Quality
http://www.brocku.ca/english/courses/1F95/depth-etc.html
On the Uses [or Value] of Studying Literature
http://www.brocku.ca/english/jlye/uses.html
Complete notes should include:
   
a.  At least two relevant critical evaluation criteria, explicitly stated (and cited if applicable);
    b.  Demonstration that the two stories under discussion do or do not meet each of your selected evaluation criteria; and 
    c.  Citation and analysis of specific examples/passages from the short stories that support your evaluations.

CLASS CONTRIBUTION:  Come to class on Wed., 11/21, prepared to share one or two of your comparative interpretations and/or evaluations, based on your notes.  Notes will be collected at the end of class.

Another Option was to submit Response #3 electronically to Cora,  to be webposted here for general class review here:

Students' Response #3 Notes & Class Contribution:
http://www.cocc.edu/cagatucci/classes/eng104/response3.htm 

Fall 2001 ENG 104 Syllabus | Course Plan | Course Pack Table of Contents | Assignments | Site Map
ENG 104 Author Links Table of Contents  | (1)  A - E  | (2)   F - L  | (3)   M - Z
Literature Links | Contexts: Literary History & Movements | Genre Studies: Fiction
ENG 104 Course Home Page

YOU ARE HERE ~ ENG 104 Response Writings ~ Fall 2001
URL of this webpage:
http://www.cocc.edu/cagatucci/classes/eng104/ResponseWritings.htm
Last Updated:  03 July 2003   


This webpage is maintained by Cora Agatucci, Professor of English,
Humanities Department, Central Oregon Community College
I welcome comments: cagatucci@cocc.edu
© Cora Agatucci, 1997-2001
Cora's Home Page | Current ScheduleCora's Classes | CopyrightSite Map

For problems with this web, contact webmaster@cocc.edu