Evaluating Web Pages
There is a cute
tutorial on web site evaluation from the Colorado State University Libraries!
Click the icon below to view

As
the tutorial itself shows, because of the
free, uncontrolled nature of the Internet, it
is very important that you evaluate the
information you find
according to certain criteria.
I am pretty sure you remember most of them from our previous discussion about "weighing
the value of your sources":
Authorship
Is there an author?
Can you contact the author?
What are the authors credentials?
Anybody
can publish anything the want on the web! Question
the reliability of a web site when it's hard to determine its authorship.
Even if a page
is signed, qualifications
may
not
be
provided, in which case you should
keep your skepticism until the reliability and qualifications of your source are
established. Note that a good web site will include contact information for its
author .
Sponsor/Publisher
Who sponsors, publishes, or hosts the document?
What is the domain:
.com (commercial organizations); .org (usually nonprofit
organizations);
.edu (educational institutions); .gov (government); .net (organizations
involved with Internet services or other commercial entities)
The
domain/address of a web site may be a good indicator of the type of organization
that may sponsor a web site. Is the sponsor well-known, reputable? What is
their agenda?
In general, .edu,
.gov, or .org web sites are considered relatively reliable sponsored by an
educational institution, a government agency, or nonprofit organization
respectively. Note, however, that .edu web
sites may also be the product of individuals such as students posting their
papers or working on a project, which means that the information you may get may
still be of questionable quality.
Currency
When was the document created?
Is the information current?
Has it been updated and when?
Are the links current?
If
a date is provided, it often appears at the bottom of a web
page. This date may have various meanings. For example,
it
may indicate when the material was first written, first
placed on the web, or last revised
Content
Is there any bias?
Why was the document
created?
Is the purpose to state an opinion or to sell
something?
Can you access all the information for free?
How well does it address the topic?
Are the links valuable?
As you look at the content of a web site,
figure out if this page is a mask for advertising,
which means that the
information might be biased.
View
any
web site
as you would an infommercial on television. Ask
yourself why was this written and for whom?
Also, explore: does the web page include
links that work?
Are the links current or updated
regularly?
Putting it all together
- Authority/
Sponsorship.
If the web page
lists the author, his/her credentials and
provides a way of contacting him/her, and . . .
-
Sponsorship. If the web page
provides information about the institution that
published it or its domain is preferred (.edu,
.gov, .org), and . . .
- Currency.
If the web page is current and updated
regularly (as stated on the page) and the links (if any) are also
up-to-date, and . . .
- Objectivity.
If your page provides accurate information with limited advertising
and it is objective in presenting the information, and . . .
- Coverage.
If you can view the information properly—not limited to fees,
browser technology, or software requirement, then . . .
You may have a higher quality web
page that could be of value to your research! |
Here are some examples of web sites
for your evaluation:
FactCheck.org (hint:
what's the nature of the web site? who put it together?)
Virusmyth (hint:
can you find information on the author or sponsor of this web site?)
Herb
Research Foundation (hint: how recently was this web site put
together?)
Martin Luther King
(hint: who authors this web site? what is their agenda?)